VIETNAM COMBAT VET TURNS
              LIBERTARIAN PEACE ACTIVIST
            by Thomas M. Sipos, managing editor. 
            [December 8, 2007]  
              
              
              
             [HollywoodInvestigator.com] 
                  David Larkin is known to California Libertarians
        for his activism, most recently serving two years as Los
          Angeles County LP Chair (2004 - 06). His activism encompasses
      many libertarian issues that he's studied over the years. But when
      it comes to his antiwar activism, Larkin speaks from experience -- he'd
      fought in Vietnam. A war for which he volunteered. 
Larkin joined the U.S. Navy
  Reserve in 1964 while still in high school. In 1966 he became active
  duty and worked in the USS Okanogan's boiler room. "The worst job on the ship," said Larkin. "One of our chiefs came
    up to me and said, 'They're looking for volunteers for Vietnam, you wanna
    go?' I said, 'Can I think about it?' He said, 'Yeah, I'll give
    you 30 seconds.' So I said, 'I'll go.' I figured anything was
    better than working in the boiler room."  
After
  additional training, Larkin was flown to Vietnam in April 1967. Thirty-six
  hours flying time from San Diego to Saigon on a four-engine propeller plane. He landed at Tansanute Air Force Base and was assigned to a naval patrol
  on the Mekong Delta and Saigon River. One of seven men in his boat's
  crew.  
"We
  were Rivron 111-1," said Larkin. "Part of the transports. Drop
  troops off, pick them up. Provide fire if needed. Generally,
  in the Navy you have two jobs. A regular job -- I worked as
  an engineman. And your general quarters job -- I was a machine gunner
  on general quarters. I had a 50 caliber machine gun and an automatic
  grenade launcher.  
 "There were other types
      of boats in our group.  A kind of patrol boat, not for carrying troops,
      just for fighting. Another like a battleship. Over time, the
      Navy
      developed lots of different weapons, because the VC would fire at you from
      these hardened bunkers. They were like adobe, made of clay, sunbaked. Even a 50 caliber round wouldn't penetrate one of those things. 
"We had the same problem
  they have now in Iraq. They'd ambush you from the side and shoot
  rockets, RPGs. We had a lot of armor. They made the boat wider to
  accommodate the extra weight, for buoyancy. But RPGs can penetrate
  armor plate like a hot knife through butter. Our armor was about
  3/4 of an inch thick. It'd stop a heavy bullet, 50 caliber, but not these
  RPGs. It's called a shape charge. They detonate against the armor
  and blow a hole through it. If you're on the other side, too bad
  for you." 
Seeking a solution, the crew
  welded rebar to the boat. "The RPGs would hit these outside bars
  first and detonate," said Larkin. "This widens the blast, so it's
  not
  concentrated, and the armor can stop it. Well, that's how it worked
  in theory. But it still detonated the armor, and guys were
  killed."  
 Larkin recounts being under
  enemy fire. "One night we were cruising up the channel. I was
  cockswain, on the wheel driving the boat. All of a sudden a rocket
  shot across and hit the boat ahead of us. Boom! Stuff
  flying everywhere.  
"Well, the armor saved them, nobody got hurt. But I didn't want to cross the line of fire, so I threw the engines in
  reverse. I heard rockets go whoosh, exploding. Two or
  three more fired. Maybe they were shooting at us but they missed. Had it hit the armor where I was, there wasn't any rebar. It'd have
  wiped me out. We lost one guy like that. One of those things hit,
  turned him into jello on the inside. 
 "I kind of saw the futility
      of it all. How we treated the Vietnamese, not really good. I remember
      a fisherman. We took him off his boat. He didn't get tortured,
      but we took him for questioning. We brought him back at the end of
      the day. Well, the boats leak. They have to constantly bail
      them. When we came back, his boat was under water. He was madder
      than a wet hen. I thought to myself, if he wasn't a Vietcong before,
      he probably is now. 
"I saw a lot of incidents
  like that. We wanted to get the people on our side. Instead
  we infuriated them half the time. Not that we didn't do good deeds. We'd throw them our C-rations and stuff like that. We tried to help
  them when we could. 
"It's kind of how libertarians
  see the government. An elephant in a china shop. They may have
  the
  intention of doing well, but they just manage, with their brute force,
  to screw things up."  
 Larkin returned to the U.S.
  in October 1967 with a Navy commendation medal bearing a combat V. "I was still in favor of the war, because this was before I became a libertarian. But I began to have questions about it. I don't know what the medal
  was for. Burglars stole it last year.  I still have the citation
  for it." 
A former Republican, Larkin
  shifted toward libertarianism in the 1980s. "What really got me interested
  was their position on the war on drugs. It made sense. I think
  I joined the party in '89. I'd been going to meetings and somebody
  says, 'Why don't you become an officer?' So I said, 'Oh, okay.' 
"When the Gulf War came,
  I was not antiwar, because I identified with our troops. But later
  I saw that a lot of the information and justification for the war was spin,
  and not necessarily true." Larkin has since continued his political
  education, and has opposed the recent wars in the Balkans and the Mideast. He can't understand why any libertarian would feel otherwise.  
 "What really shocked me was
  libertarians agreeing with the government's use of torture. I've
  had some libertarians say, 'These are bad people, torture's okay in this
  case,' forgetting everything the party stands for. Everything that
  liberty and freedom are about. 
 "Plus, this war's costing
      us a fortune. It's devastating our economy. We're spending
      so much on this military that is not redeemable. That's not doing
      anything for us. The average citizen, I don't believe, benefits from
      this stuff. They maybe say, it's protecting him, but I don't think
      so. It's just making the risk of [future] war very high.  
"Democrats waste a lot of
  money,
  but at least it's spent here, on stupid social projects. Those are
  preferable to war. 
"Being libertarians, being
  against the war on drugs, you know what the government is like. You
  know
  how they spin. How could they be so bad in everything else and good
  about this war?" 
Copyright 2007 by HollywoodInvestigator.com. 
		    
		    
		  
  		
		   
           |